Comments Received by terence2

drool ....

Cool!
:o)

Walter2

thank you

Yuriy,

Thank you for the like

2 of which I have myself - the 16-35 and the 70-200 both f/4 (which are lighter to carry than their f/2.8 siblings) and I love the both! In between those 2 I use my secondhand bought Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 which is not too bad in sharpness - but it's not a Nikon!!
Why so high ISO?
25.600 seems a bit "overkill"? Don't get me wrong - one cannot see too much noise in the low-light area, but 6.400 would not have done the trick, with stationary objects ...?
Best regards,
Walter

mitresg,

Thanks for the like.

mitresg,

Thank you for the like

mitresg,

Thank you for the like..

Kurtbekar,

thank you for the like....

Kurtbekar,

thank you for the like....