Comments by: walter2 - 09-15-14 11:29 PM Photographer: yuriylux Hi Yuriylux!
Thank you very much for your answer regarding the 70-200mm f/2.8 versus 70-200mm f/4 VR.
Your answer is what I expected. I am also looking to buy the 70-200mm f/4 VR because of the same argument that you have written here. The f/2.8 is just too heavy to lug around all day and almost twice as expensive here in Norway.
Thank you, Yuriylux!!
Best regrads from Norway,
Comments by: chriseeo - 09-15-14 9:37 PM Photographer: ronny olsson A very nice flower. Good shot, lovely color and detail.
Comments by: qbert - 09-15-14 5:30 AM Photographer: paqart Very nice, really like the concept and the warm tone.
Maybe a little rotation / vertical correction?
Comments by: yuriylux - 09-15-14 12:05 AM Photographer: yuriylux Hello Walter! Thank you very much for Your lovely comments! You ask about telesurf Nikon AF 80-200/2.8ED and Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G. Nothing is perfect - all the compromises. Nikon AF 80-200/2.8ED gives beautiful colors and a very beautiful picture, but heavy, has no stabilization and ring toggle autofocus and manual focus constantly breaks down (not a good design). Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G - less aperture (aperture 4),but quite sufficient. Sharpness across the field a beautiful, well-kept backlight. The lens is very light, does not need a tripod and it works great image stabilization,affordable price. After a long use of the hands do not get tired. The difference in the aperture of 2.8 and 4.0 in practice invisible when I need to create beautiful portraits I use a Nikon AF-S 85/1 .4G. Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4G is the perfect lens for street photography. Considering all these, I put it in the first place, but everyone chooses for themselves individually.
Sponsor Ads. Please visit to help support our site.